The anticipation for Superstar's Jailer has ignited a fervor of pre-booking excitement, particularly in the US and UK. With premier shows already declared sold out, it's becoming evident that this feverish craze is poised to make its mark in India as well, not just for the premier but for the extended weekend. While Sun Pictures' marketing blitz has undeniably played a role in this fever pitch, there's an unexpected factor that's taken the limelight – the Rajini haters, inadvertently turning into indirect promoters of the film.
Amidst this buzz, the "Superstar” title war has emerged, capturing attention for its bewildering nature. Whether initiated by ardent fans or fuelled by media sensationalism, this peculiar concept has been the talk of the town for the past month. The virtual world, especially Twitter and Facebook, has transformed into a battleground for the spirited fans of Vijay and Ajith, who regrettably engage in actions that tarnish the very image of the idols they worship. Interestingly, neither Vijay nor Ajith have lent their support to such behavior. However, a faction of overzealous enthusiasts, have taken it upon themselves to champion a cause that their idols would likely distance themselves from. This situation raises questions about the responsibility of these actors in guiding their fan base, especially when their silence could be misconstrued as tacit approval. In some ways, this scenario resembles the behavior of politicians who might not overtly endorse certain actions but might find it politically convenient to let them unfold for the sake of their publicity.
In the world of Tamil cinema, titles aren't merely honorifics; they carry the weight of legacy, symbols of adoration, fandoms, and the intricacies of a star-studded universe. Titles like "Puratchi Thalaivar" were attributed to MGR and "Nadigar Thilagam" to Sivaji Ganesan – these weren't claimed by the stars themselves; they were earned through their work, its impact, and the hearts they touched. Neither did Rajinikanth or Kamal Hassan. So, when we delve into the debate surrounding whether Vijay should aspire for the title of "Superstar," it becomes a nuanced discussion that intertwines fandom loyalty, ego, and the nature of stardom.
Fandoms often become emotionally invested in the success and stature of their idols. The desire to prove that their beloved star is on par with, or even above, another iconic figure can sometimes lead to unproductive battles. But it's essential to remember that titles don't define the essence of a star's career; their impact on cinema and society does. Drawing parallels to the realm of politics, the rise of figures like Annamalai (pitted against honorable CM Stalin) showcases how strategic positioning and alliances can alter public perception. Similarly, the push for the "Superstar" title could be seen as an attempt to enhance Vijay's stature, especially given his potential entry into politics. The world of politics, much like cinema, thrives on public image and recognition. The absence of a definitive response from Vijay regarding the "Superstar" title is a double-edged sword. While silence might be interpreted as a tacit endorsement of ambition, it's also possible that Vijay prefers to let his work speak for itself.
The lyrical narrative of Second single from Jailer "Hukum", added yet another layer of intrigue to the tussle. With subtle indications pointing towards certain lyrics as veiled references to Vijay and his father, the conversations gained momentum. However, the nuances of art can often be open to interpretation sometimes, misinterpretation. The recent Jailer audit launch event further extended these intriguing discussions within the industry and among fans. In his extended address, Rajinikanth delved into various topics, including the ongoing tussle for the top spot in his own style. Amidst his eloquent words, Rajinikanth offered a perspective that showcased his detachment from the race for supremacy, emphasizing his commitment to constant self-improvement and soaring to new heights. This is a hallmark of a true legend – someone who doesn't measure success in comparison to others, but against their own growth and potential. Though Rajinikanth's words were an ode to his unwavering dedication and focus, they inadvertently triggered speculation, with many being quick to infer that he might have been alluding to Vijay. Kalanithi Maran's intervention, however, provided a crucial context that dissolved the brewing debate. Maran's assertion that the "Superstar" title should only be bestowed upon someone who can consistently mirror Rajinikanth's achievements over decades is a reminder that such designations are earned through a legacy of excellence that transcends rivalry.
The phenomenon of Rajinikanth's appeal is undeniable – people don't just watch his films for entertainment; they seek a connection, an emotion. They see themselves in the role played by Rajinikanth. They imitate him, his style and his dialogues. This is a legacy built over decades, in a pre-social media era when screens were limited and multiplexes were a rarity. The "Superstar" title was never just about a label; it's a tribute to Rajinikanth's exceptional cinematic journey and impact. It's a culmination of passion, talent, and time – elements that can't be hurried or contrived. Rajinikanth's journey has been one of unwavering dedication, carving a niche that few can aspire to attain.
In the grand universe of cinema, the conversation around titles and stardom is just a thread. The real masterpiece is the body of work each artist creates, the emotions they stir, and the connections they forge with audiences. As fans, let's celebrate the achievements of these luminaries and appreciate the unique journey each of them is on, without getting entangled in the web of comparisons and conjectures. What happens in future is not in our hands. Till then, Superstar Rajinikanth prevails.
